What does sauron look like without armor

(Perhaps dragonfire would warm it, a little bit.) and the Ring cannot otherwise be warmed - not even slightly - by any dwarven forge or massive fire known. Sauron is implied, in the film, to be a being of fire and energy - that fire and energy radiates through the heavy armor, shines through every chink in it, and Gil Galad bursts into flame when Sauron grabs him with one gauntleted hand (not shown in the theatrical film) to be burned to a crisp in seconds. The being inside that armor, has very little in common with said armor, just as the incorporeal Ringwraiths have very little in common with their cloaks. Sauron's armor, which people are comparing with a kitchen appliance, is like the cloaks of the Ringwraiths - it is a disguise. When Sauron had physical form, and he had the Ring, back in the Second Age, it was much worse. This is because Sauron is simply so great in stature, so very powerful, and he has the ability to project his hate, his rage, his ability to inspire his own side and terrify his foes, through his gaze. The Eye is going to always be terrifying and whelming, swallowing up the features around it, looking amplified as if the viewer were looking through field glasses. Whatever his spirit form (since he cannot yet take physical shape), a person viewing Sauron is going to see the Eye only, because Sauron is regarding the viewer back. In effect, the Eye is the Avatar of Sauron. Thus, Frodo saw the fire around the Eye first obscure the pinnacle of Barad-Dur, then obscure it entirely. Thus, Frodo saw the fire consume the shadowy figures in the common room of the Prancing Pony. Or, in the case of Frodo, terrified and knocked back off the Seeing Seat by the force of Sauron's gaze.ДЄ side effect of this, is that Sauron's gaze (the Eye) seems to swallow up everything around it in fire. Thus, those who perceive the Eye are going to be daunted by the vision, then terrified, then stricken witless. this is an extension of the power and will of Sauron himself, and his power and will is awesomely great. Anyone looking at the Eye when Sauron is projecting his gaze, will see it as if looking at it through field glasses.ДЇurthermore, the Gaze of Sauron has power in itself. When his power is so projected, when his gaze is so projected, it appears bigger. Thus, he can fill his armies of orcs with hate, a lust for destruction, with strength and endurance beyond what they would normally have, with battle prowess greater than their normal combat abilities.ДЄnd so, he can project his power to perceive as well - and his power to perceive is very great, able to scry anywhere in Middle Earth, piercing through all material defenses. Sauron is able to project his power over a great distance. We know Frodo was not looking at Sauron through field glasses, much less through the eyepiece of a camcorder with the zoom turned way up. In effect, this is what happened when Frodo beheld Sauron, and Sauron beheld Frodo, when Frodo was on Amon Hen (in the film, obviously - the Eye missed Frodo in the book.) If you look at any object through field glasses (or a camcorder with the zoom lens powered way up), an object will look bigger, because it looks closer than it is. We know the Eye is much smaller than that.

It is not a thousand feet across, although one might get that impression from that scene (after all, there it is totally obscuring all the pinnacle of mighty Barad-Dur.) Now, we know that the Eye is not that big. Then, the Eye grew until the top of Barad-Dur was not visible at all.

I think there is some confusion concerning the Eye of Sauron.Д«ut I believe the whole mess of confusion can be clarified if you look at what happened, in the film, when Frodo ascended Amon Hen and beheld Barad-Dur from the Seeing Seat of Gondor.Дid you notice, that at the very start of the scene where Frodo beheld the Eye, that it seemed to blur the top of Barad-Dur around it? The mighty pinnacle of Sauron's capital city and base was blurred behind the red fire around the Eye. Here, then, is another long, never-to-the-point article by Edena_of_Neith (pity the poor people on the White Council message board, who get socked with my articles!) Now, I don't know how many of you believe that Sauron is a great floating eyeball (beholders, eat your hearts out!), but I myself think of him differently. My take, as it were, on Tolkien's conception. I wonder if Sauron-with-spikey-helmet is back?ДЄnyways, I had a response, in which I presented my views on Sauron, as he is, both in the film and in the books. On the White Council message board, there is a thread discussing the appearance of Sauron in the film FOTR.ДЄpparently, someone - not on the White Council message board, but somewhere else - commented that Sauron looked like a kitchen appliance.

What does sauron look like without armor